Immigrants Won't Face Automatic Deportation for Small Amounts of Weed

PHOTO: marijuana

Michael Betts/Getty Images

The Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that immigrants caught sharing small amounts of marijuana will not be subject to automatic deportation.

That means that Jamaican immigrant Adrian Moncrieffe can return to the U.S. and fight his deportation. After he was caught with the equivalent of three joints in Georgia in 2007, he was charged with a broad state statute that mixes lower- and higher-level marijuana offenses.

See Also: Should You Get Deported for Carrying Three Joints?

He pleaded guilty, which made him vulnerable to deportation years later. He wasn't able to appeal his deportation because his crime was classified as an "aggravated felony."

Basically, that meant that the immigration system viewed him the same way as it would view someone selling up to 10 pounds of narcotics.

Moncrieffe was a legal permanent resident who came to the U.S. at the age of 3. He had lived here for nearly three decades at the time of his arrest.

As I wrote back in October, the ruling won't bring about a major change in the immigration system, but it could affect the outcome in hundreds of similar cases each year.

Seven of the nine Supreme Court justices ruled in favor of Moncrieffe, and Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the majority opinion, a portion of which was cited in The New York Times:

"Sharing a small amount of marijuana for no remuneration, let alone possession with intent to do so, does not fit easily into the everyday understanding of trafficking, which ordinarily means some sort of commercial dealing."

NOT SURE HOW TO GET FUSION ON YOUR TV? CLICK HERE TO FIND OUT!
Alt

More than half of Americans support marijuana legalization. Still, the federal government considers it a dangerous drug. This is a look at the science, the conversations, and the politics of pot.

comments powered by Disqus

Immigration Reform

20-Year-Old Asylum Seeker Reunites With Family After 2 Years Apart

The agency that oversees these judges, the Executive Office for Immigration Review, said in response that it takes “seriously any claims of unjustified and significant anomalies in immigration judge decision-making and takes steps to evaluate disparities in immigration adjudications.”