Pizza Actually Saved This Immigrant's Life

PHOTO: Tony Torres owns a small pizza shop in La Libertad, El Salvador. His pizza baking skills, saved him from dying at the hands of Mexicos Los Zetas Gang.


When Central American immigrants travel across Mexico on their way to the U.S. they are fully aware that they can be captured by one of Mexico's feared drug cartels.

Cartels like the Zetas demand ransom payments from immigrants and kill those whose families can't pay. But Tony Torres managed to get some leniency from the Zetas after they captured him in a bus in Northern Mexico.

This Salvadoran immigrant's life was spared because he told the local Zetas commander that he could make some very tasty pizzas.

"The [Zetas] boss told me that it was his son's birthday and asked me to bake a pizza," Torres, who is now back in El Salvador, told Univision News.

The pizza was apparently so good that Torres was asked to become the cook for the group that was holding him and 14 other immigrants for ransom. Eventually, the local Zetas boss became friendly with Torres, gave him more freedom to move around, and reduced his ransom fee.

"He said I had to pay $450 cause I couldn't go without paying anything," Torres recalled.

Torres spent three months in captivity, and returned to El Salvador after the Zetas let him go. He now runs a small pizza shop in the seaside town of La Libertad.

But there is a sad side to this story, too. Torres has a daughter in the U.S., whom he's never seen, because her mother moved north while she was pregnant.

Torres says that he hopes to see his daughter one day. But his experience with the Zetas dissuades him from once again trying to make the long, and clearly dangerous, trek.


For more than 40 years, the U.S. government has waged a war on drugs. Unfortunately, there are many issues with that war and its perceived success.

comments powered by Disqus

Immigration Reform

20-Year-Old Asylum Seeker Reunites With Family After 2 Years Apart

The agency that oversees these judges, the Executive Office for Immigration Review, said in response that it takes “seriously any claims of unjustified and significant anomalies in immigration judge decision-making and takes steps to evaluate disparities in immigration adjudications.”