As tensions between oil pipeline protestors and police forces in North Dakota escalate, a decades-long conflict in Nigeria’s Niger Delta rages on, illustrating just how bad things can really get when big oil and native communities collide.
Earlier this week, militants in the Nigeria’s oil rich delta lands blew up the Nembe Creek Trunk Line pipeline operated by Shell, AGIP, and Oanda. The attack came just weeks after two other bombings that destroyed another major crude oil conduit, the Trans-Forcados pipeline. All three assaults are believed to be the work of the Niger Delta Avengers (NDA)—one of the new militant groups demanding restitution for what they claim are years of exploitation and environmental destruction in the Niger Delta by the government and international oil companies.
Bombings like the one that crippled the Nembe Creek pipeline are particularly hard hitting for the Nigerian economy which relies on oil for approximately 92% of their exports. Despite the fact that almost all of this oil is produced in the Southern states of the Niger Delta, the region remains grossly impoverished and underdeveloped. For the 20 million inhabitant of the area, this often means living without the most basic needs.
“The entire area is poison.”
The NDA say they won’t stop attacking oil facilities until a greater portion of the oil wealth goes to the swampland region where it is produced.
“Since the day crude oil and gas resources was discovered, for the past 60 years, we’re only asking for potable water, electricity, affordable healthcare, quality education, etc.,” the Avengers said in a statement by their spokesman, Brig. Gen Mudoch Agbinido. “The history of communal lives is terror of poverty, inhumanity, and desolate living conditions. But when you move into these facilities operated by multinational oil corporations they are living like kings.”
Groups like the NDA represent the newest generation of combatants in this David-versus-Goliath fight against big oil, bred not only from the long-time struggle against the government backed petroleum industry, but also from a history of ethnic violence. These new militant groups are well armed and trained says Prof. Darren Kew Chair of the McCormack Graduate School’s Department of Conflict Resolution, Human Security, and Global Governance.
“A number of political leaders I’ve spoken to are just baffled at how sophisticated the bombing attacks have been,” said Kew. “In the past, militants would attack installations coming up in speedboats with machine guns. Now, they are able to put bombs and other things on some of the oil refineries or some of the piping without anyone seeing and they set it off remotely at the exact time they say they will.”
Kew says that it’s too simple to view these militants as just freedom fighters or environmental crusaders and that while some may be motivated by a political agenda, many sometimes act like mercenaries or Mafioso thugs.
Fynface Dumnamene Fynface, an Ogoni activist and program officer for the Nigerian NGO, Social Action, can understand why jobless and desperate young men would resort to violence, but thinks that these militant groups are just making things worse.
“When these pipelines are blown up, the environment suffers,” he said. “The crude oil from the pipes spill into the environment, and people die from it.”
There are hundreds of oil spills in the Niger Delta every year, making it one of the most polluted places on the planet. Over the past six decades, these oil spills have transformed the once rich river delta into an unlivable wasteland. The air is toxic, the creeks lifeless, mangrove forests destroyed, and the fishing and farming industry, once a staple of the local economy, is no longer feasible.
“The entire area is poison,” Fynface said. “In Ogoniland, you have evidences of people getting illnesses, strange diseases. You have rashes, miscarriages. You have premature deaths. You have girls who are still very young, under the age of 12, entering menopause.”
Fynface continues to appeal to the international community to help bring an end to the conflict and begin the cleanup of the region, but there seems to be no end in sight. November’s attacks came during ongoing negotiations between regional leaders and the Nigerian government, shattering a short-lived ceasefire. In response, the government has deployed a large military force in the Niger Delta, further escalating tensions in the region.
“Certainly there are elements of the Niger Delta story that are a cautionary tale for the United States in the sense that any sort of urge to forcefully repress these type of movements tends to strengthen them and legitimize the arguments they are making.”
While all this may seem like a far cry from the peaceful prayer ceremonies being held in North Dakota, echoes of Standing Rock can be heard amidst the explosions rocking the Niger Delta today.
Much like the #NoDAPL protests, the conflict in the Niger Delta was borne out of non-violent campaigns that took place throughout the 1990s. The then military dictatorship responded by banning public gatherings, conducting military raids, mass arrests, and ultimately executing the writer and activist, Ken Saro Wiwa. Experts often attribute the brutal military repression of peaceful movements in the 1990s to the rise of militancy in the early 2000s and to the violence we see today.
Fortunately, the United States is not under a military dictatorship like Nigeria in the 1990s—at least not yet. Water defenders at Standing Rock still believe that problems can be solved through democratic means, organized demonstration, and litigation; however, the aggressive tactics used by state police on peaceful protestors in North Dakota undoubtedly undermines the foundation that makes such non-violent protests possible.
“Certainly there are elements of the Niger Delta story that are a cautionary tale for the United States in the sense that any sort of urge to forcefully repress these type of movements tends to strengthen them and legitimize the arguments they are making,” Kew said. “The longer that these disputes carry on, you can create whole generations who are schooled in the belief system that the government is the enemy.”
Could the scene at Standing Rock turn violent? “Surely it’s possible,” said Dave Cortez, an organizer for the Sierra Club coordinating Dakota Access pipeline protests in Texas.
“When you have mercenaries with dogs, when you have rubber bullets the size of tennis balls and golf balls, mace and pepper spray used on women, when you have elders dragged out of their ceremonial sweat lodges in their underwear, things come over you, you make instant decisions and you react to that,” Cortez said. “But, I am willing to bet though that many people recognize that in the long run we have to do what we can to remain peaceful and nonviolent.”
Michael Watts, a professor of Geography and Development at UC Berkeley is not so optimistic. With Donald Trump on his way to the White House, Watt’s thinks things are just going to get worse for Standing Rock protestors. “Given the fact it’s Trump, given what we think and what he has said his policy will be toward energy, you can well anticipate that these types of anti-pipeline activities are going to be seen with an enormous amount of hostility,” Watts said.
Watts also pointed out that while Americans have been critical of the oil industry operating in other countries like Nigeria, the Standing Rock protest is the first popular movement against big oil to take place in the United States.
“Who knows what will happen?” he says. “But if you don’t take civic and popular movements seriously, what you essentially do is increase the local resentments and enhance the likelihood that things will turn deeply conflicted and very possibly violent. That, in a sense, is what I think is the moral of the Nigeria story.”